How Many Animals Die Each Year In The World

Killing of animals for man nutrient

The Butcher and his Retainer (1568), drawn and engraved by Jost Amman

Number of Land Animals Killed for Meat in 2019^[1]

Animals	Number Killed
Chickens	72,118,779,000
Ducks	three,311,899,000
Pigs	i,348,541,419
Geese	723,648,000
Turkeys	635,955,000
Rabbits	633,013,000
Sheep	602,319,130
Goats	502,808,495
Cattle	324,518,029
Rodents	70,977,000
Pigeons and other birds	46,216,000
H2o buffalo	27,692,388
Horses	4,940,693
Camels	2,991,884
Donkeys	1,958,602
Other camelids	967,656
Deers	628,542
Mules	130,804

Fauna slaughter is the killing of animals, normally referring to killing domestic livestock. It is estimated that each twelvemonth 80 billion land animals are slaughtered for food.^[ane] In general, the animals would be killed for food; however, they might also be slaughtered for other reasons such equally being diseased and unsuitable for consumption. The slaughter involves some initial cutting, opening the major body cavities to remove the entrails and offal but usually leaving the carcass in one slice. Such dressing tin can exist done by hunters in the field (field dressing of game) or in a abattoir. Later, the carcass is usually butchered into smaller cuts.

The animals nearly commonly slaughtered for food are cattle and water buffalo for beefiness and veal, sheep for lamb and mutton, goats for goat meat, pigs for pork, deers for venison, horses for horse meat, poultry (mainly chickens, turkeys, ducks and geese), insects (a commercial species is the house cricket), and increasingly, fish in the aquaculture industry (fish farming). In 2020, Faunalytics institute that the countries with the largest number of slaughtered cows and chickens are Communist china, the United states, and Brazil. Concerning pigs, they are slaughtered by far the most in Communist china, followed by the Usa, Federal republic of germany, Kingdom of spain, Vietnam, and Brazil. Looking at the per centum graph for sheep, we observe again that China slaughtered the most sheep, this time followed by Commonwealth of australia and New Zealand. Finally, the corporeality (in tonnes) of fish used for product is highest in China, Indonesia, Peru, India, Russian federation, and the U.s. (in that order).^[2]

Modern history [edit]

The apply of a sharpened bract for the slaughtering of livestock has been practised throughout history. Prior to the development of electrical stunning equipment, some species were killed by merely hit them with a blunt instrument, sometimes followed by exsanguination with a knife.^{[ citation needed ]}

The belief that this was unnecessarily vicious and painful to the animal somewhen led to the adoption of specific stunning and slaughter methods in many countries. One of the start campaigners on the matter was the eminent physician, Benjamin Ward Richardson, who spent many years of his later on working life developing more humane methods of slaughter as a result of attempting to discover and accommodate substances capable of producing full general or local anaesthesia to salvage pain in people. As early as 1853, he designed a sleeping room that could kill animals past gassing them. He besides founded the Model Abattoir Lodge in 1882 to investigate and campaign for humane methods of slaughter and experimented with the use of electric current at the Majestic Polytechnic Institution.^[iii]

The evolution of stunning technologies occurred largely in the first half of the twentieth century. In 1911, the Council of Justice to Animals (afterwards the Humane Slaughter Association, or HSA) was established in England to improve the slaughter of livestock.^[4] In the early on 1920s, the HSA introduced and demonstrated a mechanical stunner, which led to the adoption of humane stunning by many local regime.^[5]

The HSA went on to play a key role in the passage of the Slaughter of Animals Act 1933. This fabricated the mechanical stunning of cows and electrical stunning of pigs compulsory, with the exception of Jewish and Muslim meat.^{[5] [half dozen]} Modern methods, such as the captive commodities pistol and electric tongs were required, and the act's wording specifically outlawed the poleaxe. The period was marked by the development of various innovations in slaughterhouse technologies, non all of them especially long-lasting.^{[ citation needed ]}

Methods [edit]

Stunning [edit]

Diverse methods are used to render an beast unconscious during beast slaughter.

Electrical (stunning or slaughtering with electrical current known as electronarcosis)

This method is used for swine, sheep, calves, cattle, and goats.^{[ citation needed ]} Current is practical either across the brain or the heart to render the animal unconscious earlier being killed. In industrial slaughterhouses, chickens are killed prior to scalding by being passed through an electrified water-bathroom while shackled.^[7]

Gaseous (Carbon dioxide)

This method tin be used for sheep, calves and swine. The creature is asphyxiated by the utilize of CO₂ gas before existence killed. In several countries, CO_two stunning is mainly used on pigs. A number of pigs enter a chamber which is then sealed and filled with fourscore% to 90% CO₂ in air. The pigs lose consciousness within 13 to 30 seconds. Older research produced conflicting results, with some showing pigs tolerated CO₂ stunning and others showing they did not.^{[8] [9] [ten]} However, the current scientific consensus is that the "inhalation of high concentration of carbon dioxide is aversive and can be sad to animals."^[11] Nitrogen has been used to induce unconsciousness, often in conjunction with CO₂. Domestic turkeys are averse to high concentrations of CO₂ (72% CO₂ in air) but not low concentrations (a mixture of 30% CO_two and 60% argon in air with three% residual oxygen).^[12]

Stunning a cow with a captive bolt pistol

A hen being slaughtered in Brazil

Mechanical (Convict commodities pistol)

This method can be used for sheep, swine, goats, calves, cattle, horses, mules, and other equines. A convict bolt pistol is practical to the head of the animal to apace render them unconscious earlier being killed. There are three types of captive commodities pistols, penetrating, not-penetrating and gratuitous bolt. The use of penetrating convict bolts has largely been discontinued in commercial situations to minimize the take chances of transmission of disease when parts of the brain enter the bloodstream.^{[ citation needed ]}

Firearm (gunshot/costless bullet)

This method tin can be used for cattle, calves, sheep, swine, goats, horses, mules, and other equines. It is also the standard method for taking down wild game animals such as deer with the intention of consuming their meat. A conventional firearm is used to fire a bullet into the brain or through the heart of the animal to return the brute quickly unconscious (and presumably dead).

Killing [edit]

Video of hen beingness slaughtered

Exsanguination

The animal either has its throat cut or has a chest stick inserted cutting close to the middle. In both these methods, principal veins and/or arteries are cut and allowed to bleed.^{[xiii] [14]}

Transmission

Used on poultry and other animals; dissimilar methods are proficient, here are some examples: a) grabbing the bird by the head so snapping its neck using quick and fast movements b) the bird is put upside downwards within a metal funnel, then the head is either quickly cutting or hit using the back terminate of a machete or knife. c) cattle, sheep and goats are tied and so struck multiple times in the head with a sledgehammer until the brute dies or losses consciousness.

Drug administration

Drug assistants is used to ensure the animal is dead.^{[ citation needed ]} Still, being that this method is expensive, time-consuming, and renders the animals' bodies toxic and inedible, it is mainly used for brute euthanasia, not every bit a commercialized slaughter method.

Preslaughter handling [edit]

Inside a truck transporting farm animals to slaughter. Dehydration, injuries, stress, and illness are common during preslaughter transport, and cramped and unhygienic conditions are typical of the process.

Whether animals are humanely stunned earlier slaughter or not, they can suffer stress while waiting to be killed.^[15] A 1996 veterinary review plant that in that location are many ways in which animals suffer and die during the preslaughter catamenia. They include:

• Dehydration: Animals may not be provided with water at market or during their journey to the slaughterhouse and may arrive dehydrated. The effects of severe dehydration include severe thirst, nausea, a hot-dry body, dry tongue, loss of co-ordination and concentrated urine of a small book.
• Emotional stress during transport: The unfamiliarity of beingness on lath a transport truck causes fear in animals, and if they are cooped up with others who they practice not know, they may showtime fighting. The noise and jolting of the truck also causes stress and cows, pigs, horses and birds are at item risk of suffering from move sickness.
• Temperature stress during transport: Some animals die because of the estrus that develops in the closely bars weather on board the transport truck. During transport, animals are non able to limited all the behaviors which normally allow them to continue absurd like seeking shade, wallowing, licking their fur or stretching their wings and legs. During transport the only useful manner they can dissipate heat is past panting. In colder climates, the animals can exist exposed to extreme low temperatures, resulting in hypothermia.
• Torn skin, bruising and injury: Acquired by rough handling of animals, such every bit beating the animals with sticks when they refuse to move forward or dragging them along the basis when they autumn downwards. The insults which lead to bruising may be painful, and the swelling and inflammation associated with a bruise lead to a longer-lasting hurting.
• Sickness and disease: Farmers vary between countries in their attitude as to which sick and diseased animals tin can be sent for slaughter. Some accept the view that the slaughterhouses are skillful at salvaging what they tin from carcasses then well-nigh diseased animals are sent in, whereas in other countries farmers appreciate that diseased stock are depression class and their likely low return does not justify sending them in. Sickness and disease are two of the most serious forms of animal suffering and transporting seriously sick animals imposes an additional stress.
• Fecal soiling: In some countries, peculiarly where animals come off lush pasture, send is the main period when they option up torso surface fecal contamination. The emotional stress associated with transport no doubt induces defecation and this compounds the problem.

National laws [edit]

Europe [edit]

A squealer being slaughtered in Italy.

The measures for sanitary checks, fauna welfare protection and slaughtering procedures are harmonised throughout the European Marriage, and detailed past the European Commissions' regulations CE 853/2004, 854/2004 and 1099/2009.^{[ citation needed ]}

Canada [edit]

In Canada, the handling and slaughter of food animals is a shared responsibleness of the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA), industry, stakeholders, transporters, operators and every person who handles live animals. Canadian law requires that all federally registered slaughter establishments ensure that all species of food animals are handled and slaughtered humanely. The CFIA verifies that federal slaughter establishments are compliant with the Meat Inspection Regulations. The CFIA's humane slaughter requirements take effect when the animals arrive at the federally registered slaughter establishment. Industry is required to comply with the Meat Inspection Regulations for all animals under their care. The Meat Inspection Regulations define the atmospheric condition for the humane slaughter of all species of food animals in federally registered establishments. Some of the provisions independent in the regulations include:

• guidelines and procedures for the proper unloading, holding and movement of animals in slaughter facilities
• requirements for the segregation and treatment of ill or injured animals
• requirements for the humane slaughter of food animals^[16]

Uk [edit]

Fauna slaughter in the UK is governed under both its own laws and EU constabulary regarding slaughter. The Department for Environs, Nutrient and Rural Affairs (Defra) is the main governing torso responsible for legislation and codes of practice roofing animate being slaughter in the U.k..^{[ citation needed ]}

In the UK the methods of slaughter are largely the aforementioned every bit those used in the United States with some differences. The apply of captive bolt equipment and electrical stunning are approved methods of stunning sheep, goats, cattle and calves for consumption^[xiv]- with the employ of gas reserved for swine.^[17]

Until 2004, it was illegal to slaughter animals in sight of their conspecifics (members of the same species) considering it was thought to cause them distress. However, there was a business organization that moving the animals abroad from their conspecifics to a different place to exist slaughtered would increase the stun-to-kill time (time between stunning the animal and killing it) for the stunned animal, increasing the risk the animal would regain consciousness and it was consequently recommended that slaughter in forepart of conspecifics exist permitted alongside a mandatory limit on stun-to-impale time. Legislation was introduced which immune animals to be slaughtered in sight of their conspecifics merely there was no legislation for a legal maximum stun-to-impale time. Some critics argue that this resulted in the "worst of both worlds", as information technology mean that the slaughter methods now caused distress to conspecifics without reliably ensuring the animals were killed before regaining consciousness.^[18]

United States [edit]

In the Us, the Us Department of Agronomics (USDA) specifies the approved methods of livestock slaughter:^[19]

Each of these methods is outlined in detail, and the regulations require that inspectors identify operations which cause "undue" "excitement and discomfort" of animals.

In 1958, the law that is enforced today by the USDA Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) was passed equally the Humane Slaughter Deed of 1958. This Deed requires the proper handling and humane treatment of all food animals slaughtered in USDA inspected slaughter plants. Information technology does not apply to chickens or other birds.^[20]

4D Meat [edit]

Meat from animals which are expressionless, diseased, disabled or dying (4-D meat) on the arrival at the slaughterhouse is often salvaged for rendering,^[21] and used by a wide range of industries including pet food manufacturers, zoos, greyhound kennels, and mink ranches.^[22]

The U.S. Code (Title 21, Chapter 12, Subchapter 2, § 644) ^[23] Regulates transactions, transportation, or importation of 4–D animals to prevent use as man food:

"No person, firm, or corporation engaged in the business organisation of buying, selling, or transporting in commerce, or importing, dead, dying, disabled, or diseased animals, or any parts of the carcasses of any animals that died otherwise than by slaughter, shall purchase, sell, ship, offering for auction or transportation, or receive for transportation, in commerce, or import, whatever dead, dying, disabled, or diseased cattle, sheep, swine, goats, horses, mules or other equines, or parts of the carcasses of whatever such animals that died otherwise than past slaughter, unless such transaction, transportation or importation is made in accord with such regulations as the Secretary may prescribe to assure that such animals, or the unwholesome parts or products thereof, volition be prevented from beingness used for human nutrient purposes."

The 2004 report to U.s.a. Congress titled "Animal Rendering: Economics and Policy",^[24] bachelor in the library of Congressional Research Service, in the 'Introduction' paragraph explains Renderers in the U.s. and Canada convert expressionless animals and other waste material material into sellable products:

"Renderers convert dead animals and animal parts that otherwise would require disposal into a variety of materials, including edible and inedible tallow and lard and proteins such every bit meat and bone meal (MBM). These materials in plough are exported or sold to domestic manufacturers of a wide range of industrial and consumer appurtenances such as livestock feed and pet nutrient, soaps, pharmaceuticals, lubricants, plastics, personal intendance products, and even crayons."

Although some authors accept found wellness problems associated with the consumption of 4D meat by certain species in its raw grade,^[25] or found information technology potentially chancy,^[26] FDA considers it fit for creature consumption:

"Pet nutrient consisting of cloth from diseased animals or animals which have died otherwise than by slaughter, which is in violation of 402(a)(5) will non unremarkably be actionable, if information technology is not otherwise in violation of the police force. Information technology will be considered fit for animal consumption." ^[27]

Religious laws [edit]

Ritual slaughter is the overarching term accounting for diverse methods of slaughter used by religions around the globe for food product. While keeping religious autonomy, these methods of slaughter, inside the Usa, are governed by the Humane Slaughter Human action and various religion-specific laws, most notably, Shechita and Dhabihah.

Jewish constabulary (Shechita) [edit]

Animal slaughter in Judaism falls in accordance to the religious police of Shechita. In training, the beast beingness prepared for slaughter must be considered kosher (fit) before the act of slaughter tin commence and consumed. The basic law of the Shechita process requires the rapid and uninterrupted severance of the major vital organs and vessels. They slit the throat, resulting in a quick drib in blood pressure, restricting blood to the brain. This abrupt loss of pressure results in the rapid and irreversible cessation of consciousness and sensibility to pain (a requirement held in high regard by almost institutions.)^[28]

Islamic law (Dhabihah) [edit]

Beast slaughtering in Islam is in accordance with the Qur'an. To slaughter an animal is to cause it to pass from a living country to a dead state. For the meat to be lawful (Halal) according to Islam, it must come from an animal which is a member of a lawful species and it must exist ritually slaughtered, i.e. according to the Law, or the sole code recognized by the group every bit legitimate. The animal is killed in ways similar to the Jewish ritual with the throat being slit (dhabh), resulting in a quick drop in blood force per unit area, restricting blood to the brain. This abrupt loss of pressure level results in the rapid and irreversible cessation of consciousness and sensibility to pain (a requirement held in loftier regard by near institutions.). The slaughterer must say Bismillah (In the name of Allah/God) before slaughtering the beast.^[29] Claret must be drained out of the carcass.^[30]

Sikh community (Jhatka) [edit]

The practice of Jhatka in Republic of india developed out of the Sikh tradition in accord with the value of Ahimsa (no damage). Sikhs believe that an animal should be slaughtered apace and with as little pain every bit possible in order to reduce bad Karma that may result from such a practise. In India today most establishments will provide both Halal and Jhatka options for dishes containing chicken and lamb. Jhakta meat is not widely bachelor outside Republic of india. Jhatka meat is also frequently considered to be the preferred method of slaughter for Sikhs in Republic of india and abroad.

Furnishings on livestock workers [edit]

In 2010, Man Rights Sentinel described slaughterhouse line piece of work in the Us as a human rights crime.^[31] Slaughterhouses in the United States commonly illegally employ and exploit underage workers and illegal immigrants.^{[32] [33]} In a report by Oxfam America, slaughterhouse workers were observed not being immune breaks, were ofttimes required to habiliment diapers, and were paid below minimum wage.^[34]

American slaughterhouse workers are three times more probable to suffer serious injury than the average American worker.^[35] NPR reports that hog and cattle slaughterhouse workers are nearly seven times more probable to endure repetitive strain injuries than average.^[36] The Guardian reports that on boilerplate there are ii amputations a week involving slaughterhouse workers in the United States.^[37] On average, one employee of Tyson Foods, the largest meat producer in America, is injured and amputates a finger or limb per month.^[38] The Bureau of Investigative Journalism reported that over a catamenia of six years, in the Britain 78 slaughter workers lost fingers, parts of fingers or limbs, more than 800 workers had serious injuries, and at least 4,500 had to take more than three days off after accidents.^[39] In a 2018 written report in the Italian Periodical of Nutrient Safety, slaughterhouse workers are instructed to wearable ear protectors to protect their hearing from the abiding screams of animals being killed.^[twoscore] A 2004 study in the Journal of Occupational and Ecology Medicine found that "excess risks were observed for mortality from all causes, all cancers, and lung cancer" in workers employed in the New Zealand meat processing industry.^[41]

The worst thing, worse than the physical danger, is the emotional price. If yous work in the stick pit [where hogs are killed] for any menstruum of time—that let's [sic] yous kill things just doesn't let you care. You may wait a pig in the middle that's walking around in the blood pit with you lot and think, 'God, that really isn't a bad looking beast.' Y'all may desire to pet it. Pigs down on the impale floor take come up to nuzzle me like a puppy. Ii minutes later I had to kill them – beat them to death with a piping. I can't care.

—Gail A. Eisnitz, ^[42]

The act of slaughtering animals, or of raising or transporting animals for slaughter, may engender psychological stress or trauma in the people involved.^{[43] [44] [45]} A 2016 written report in Organization indicates, "Regression analyses of information from 10,605 Danish workers across 44 occupations suggest that slaughter-house workers consistently feel lower physical and psychological well-being along with increased incidences of negative coping behavior."^[46] In her thesis submitted to and canonical by University of Colorado, Anna Dorovskikh states that abattoir workers are "at take chances of Perpetration-Inducted Traumatic Stress, which is a course of posttraumatic stress disorder and results from situations where the concerning subject suffering from PTSD was a causal participant in creating the traumatic situation."^[47] A 2009 report by criminologist Amy Fitzgerald indicates, "slaughterhouse employment increases total arrest rates, arrests for fierce crimes, arrests for rape, and arrests for other sexual activity offenses in comparison with other industries."^[48] As authors from the PTSD Journal explicate, "These employees are hired to impale animals, such every bit pigs and cows that are largely gentle creatures. Carrying out this action requires workers to disconnect from what they are doing and from the creature standing before them. This emotional racket can pb to consequences such equally domestic violence, social withdrawal, feet, drug and booze abuse, and PTSD."^[49]

Public attitudes [edit]

Even though around 90% of US adults regularly consume meat,^[50] well-nigh one-half of them appear to support a ban on slaughterhouses: in Sentience Establish's 2017 survey on attitudes towards animal farming with 1,094 Us adults 49% of them "support a ban on manufacturing plant farming, 47% support a ban on slaughterhouses, and 33% support a ban on animal farming".^{[51] [52] [53]} The 2017 survey was replicated past researchers at the Oklahoma Country University, who found similar result. They as well got 73% of respondents answering "yes" to the question "Were yous aware that slaughterhouses are where livestock are killed and processed into meat, such that, without them, you would non be able to consume meat?".^{[54] [55]}

In the United States, many public protest slaughters were held in the late 1960s and early on 1970s by the National Farmers System. Protesting low prices for meat, farmers would kill their ain animals in front of media representatives. The carcasses were wasted and not eaten. However, this effort backfired because it angered tv audiences to see animals being needlessly and wastefully killed.^[56]

Fauna welfare [edit]

In that location has been controversy over whether or not animals should be slaughtered and over the various methods used. Some people believe sentient beings should not exist harmed regardless of the purpose, or that meat production is an bereft justification for harm.^[57]

Religious slaughter laws and practices have ever been a subject of contend, and the certification and labeling of meat products remain to be standardized. Animal welfare concerns are beingness addressed to improve slaughter practices by providing more training and new regulations. There are differences between conventional and religious slaughter practices, although both have been criticized on grounds of animate being welfare. Concerns about religious slaughter focus on the stress caused during the training stages before the slaughtering, pain and distress that may be experienced during and after the neck cutting and the worry of a prolonged period of time of lost brain function during the points between death and grooming if a stunning technique such equally electronarcosis is not applied.^[58]

See too [edit]

• Creature cede
• Carnism
• Controlled-atmosphere killing
• Fish slaughter
• Equus caballus slaughter
• Ike jime, a Japanese method of slaughtering fish
• Meat
• Pig slaughter
• Udhiyyah or Qurbani, the sacrifice of a livestock animal according to Islamic law

References [edit]

1. ^ ^{a b} "FAOSTAT". www.fao.org. Archived from the original on 8 December 2021. Retrieved 8 December 2021.
2. ^ "Global Animal Slaughter Statistics & Charts: 2020 Update". 29 July 2020.
3. ^  This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain:Power, D'Arcy (1901). "Richardson, Benjamin Ward". Dictionary of National Biography (1st supplement). London: Smith, Elder & Co.
4. ^ "Humane Slaughter Association Newsletter March 2011" (PDF). Humane Slaughter Association. Archived (PDF) from the original on 14 July 2014. Retrieved one July 2014.
5. ^ ^{a b} "History of the HSA". Humane Slaughter Association. Archived from the original on fourteen July 2014. Retrieved 1 July 2014.
6. ^ Leese, Arnold. "The Legalised Cruelty Of Shechita: The Jewish Method Of Cattle-Slaughter". Archived from the original on 22 August 2014. Retrieved one July 2014.
7. ^ Mead, G.C., ed. (2004). Poultry meat processing and quality. Cambridge: Woodhead Pub. p. 71. ISBN978-1-85573-903-1 . Retrieved 6 Nov 2015.
8. ^ "When is carbon dioxide stunning used in abattoirs?". RSPCA. Archived from the original on 20 April 2016. Retrieved 14 June 2013.
9. ^ Jongman, Due east.C; Barnett, J.50; Hemsworth, P.H (2000). "The aversiveness of carbon dioxide stunning in pigs and a comparison of the CO2 stunner crate vs. The V-restrainer". Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 67 (1–ii): 67–76. doi:10.1016/s0168-1591(99)00103-3. PMID 10719190.
10. ^ Raj, A. B. Mohan; Gregory, Due north. G. (Nov 1995). "Welfare Implications of the Gas Stunning of Pigs 1. Determination of Aversion to the Initial Inhalation of Carbon Dioxide or Argon". Animal Welfare. 4 (four): 273–280.
11. ^ "Stunning of Pigs with Carbon Dioxide" (PDF). International Coalition For Animal Welfare. Archived (PDF) from the original on 20 December 2019.
12. ^ Raj, A. B. M. (1996). "Aversive reactions of turkeys to argon, carbon dioxide and a mixture of carbon dioxide and argon". Veterinary Record. 138 (24): 592–593. doi:x.1136/vr.138.24.592. PMID 8799986. S2CID 34896415.
13. ^ "Farmed animal welfare: Slaughter". Section for Surround Food and Rural Affairs. iii September 2009. Archived from the original on 26 September 2009. Retrieved 15 March 2010.
14. ^ ^{a b} "Slaughter Red". Hsa.org.uk. Archived from the original on 15 October 2011. Retrieved 18 October 2011.
15. ^ Gregory, N. G. (1 January 1996). "Welfare and hygiene during preslaughter treatment". Meat Science. Meat for the Consumer 42 International Congress of MEAT Science and Engineering science. 43: 35–46. doi:ten.1016/0309-1740(96)00053-8. ISSN 0309-1740. PMID 22060639.
16. ^ "Humane Treatment and Slaughter of Nutrient Animals in Canada". Canadian Food Inspection Agency. 16 March 2013. Archived from the original on 7 April 2014. Retrieved 4 April 2014.
17. ^ "Pig Slaughter". Hsa.org.uk. Archived from the original on xvi November 2011. Retrieved xviii October 2011.
18. ^ Assistance, Beast. "The humane slaughter myth." (2009), page sixteen
19. ^ "Humane Slaughter of Livestock Regulations (National Citation: nine C.F.R. 313.1 – ninety)". Animal Legal and Historical Center (regulations from USDA). 2007. Archived from the original on 27 May 2008. Retrieved 26 June 2008.
20. ^ "Humane Methods of Slaughter Human activity". National Agronomical Library. Archived from the original on 7 April 2014. Retrieved iv April 2014.
21. ^ "4D meat". Medical-lexicon.thefreedictionary.com. Archived from the original on 26 September 2018. Retrieved 25 September 2018.
22. ^ "Compliance Policy Guides –CPG Sec. 690.500 Uncooked Meat for Animal Nutrient". Fda.gov. Archived from the original on 7 September 2018. Retrieved 25 September 2018.
23. ^ "21 U.S. Code § 644 – Regulation of transactions, transportation, or importation of 4–D animals to forbid utilise as human nutrient". Law.cornell.edu. Archived from the original on 26 September 2018. Retrieved 25 September 2018.
24. ^ South., Becker, Geoffrey (17 March 2004). "Animal Rendering: Economics and Policy". Digital Library. Archived from the original on 26 September 2018. Retrieved 25 September 2018.
25. ^ "THE Utilise OF "four-D MEAT" IN THE GREYHOUND RACING INDUSTRY" (PDF). Grey2kusa.org . Retrieved 30 January 2019.
26. ^ "Meat-based diets". Vegepets.info. Archived from the original on 3 Oct 2018. Retrieved 25 September 2018.
27. ^ "FDA Compliance Policy Guide Sec. 690.300 about Canned Pet Food". Fda.gov. Archived from the original on 7 September 2018. Retrieved 1 August 2018.
28. ^ Jones, Sam. "Halal, shechita and the politics of animal slaughter". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 5 Feb 2017. Retrieved thirteen December 2016.
29. ^ Benkheira, Mohammed (2000). "Artificial expiry, canonical decease: Ritual slaughter in Islam". Food and Foodways. four. eight (4): 227–252. doi:10.1080/07409710.2000.9962092. S2CID 143164349.
30. ^ Jones, Sam. "Halal, shechita and the politics of animal slaughter". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 19 January 2016. Retrieved 2 Feb 2016.
31. ^ "Rights on the Line". xi Dec 2010. Archived from the original on 30 September 2019. Retrieved 23 May 2019.
32. ^ Waldman, Peter (29 December 2017). "America's Worst Graveyard Shift Is Grinding Up Workers". Bloomberg Businessweek. Archived from the original on 24 May 2019. Retrieved 23 May 2019.
33. ^ Grabell, Michael (1 May 2017). "Exploitation and Corruption at the Chicken Establish". The New Yorker. Archived from the original on ten May 2019. Retrieved 23 May 2019.
34. ^ Grabell, Michael. "Live on the Live". Oxfam America. Archived from the original on 17 May 2019. Retrieved 23 May 2019.
35. ^ "Meatpacking". Occupational Rubber and Wellness Assistants. Archived from the original on 25 May 2019. Retrieved 23 May 2019.
36. ^ Lowe, Peggy (eleven August 2016). "Working 'The Chain,' Slaughterhouse Workers Face Lifelong Injuries". National Public Radio. Archived from the original on 19 May 2019. Retrieved 23 May 2019.
37. ^ "Two amputations a week: the cost of working in a United states meat found". The Guardian. 5 July 2018. Archived from the original on 19 May 2019. Retrieved 23 May 2019.
38. ^ Lewis, Cora (18 February 2018). "America's Largest Meat Producer Averages One Amputation Per Month". Buzzfeed News. Archived from the original on 13 June 2019. Retrieved 23 May 2019.
39. ^ "Revealed: Shocking condom tape of United kingdom meat plants". The Agency of Investigative Journalism. 29 July 2018. Archived from the original on 25 May 2019. Retrieved 23 May 2019.
40. ^ Francesca Iulietto, Maria; Sechi, Paola (iii July 2018). "Noise assessment in slaughterhouses by means of a smartphone app". Italian Journal of Food Safety. 7 (2): 7053. doi:10.4081/ijfs.2018.7053. PMC6036995. PMID 30046554.
41. ^ McLean, D; Cheng, Due south (June 2004). "Mortality and cancer incidence in New Zealand meat workers". Periodical of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 61 (half-dozen): 541–547. doi:10.1136/oem.2003.010587. PMC1763658. PMID 15150395.
42. ^ Eisnitz, Gail A. (1997). Abattoir: : The Shocking Story of Greed, Neglect, And Inhumane Treatment Inside the U.S. Meat Manufacture. Prometheus Books.
43. ^ "Sheep farmer who felt and so guilty almost driving his lambs to slaughter rescues them and becomes a vegetarian". The Independent. xxx Jan 2019. Archived from the original on 31 January 2019. Retrieved 30 Jan 2019.
44. ^ Victor, Karen; Barnard, Antoni (20 April 2016). "Slaughtering for a living: A hermeneutic phenomenological perspective on the well-existence of slaughterhouse employees". International Periodical of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being. 11: 30266. doi:10.3402/qhw.v11.30266. PMC4841092. PMID 27104340.
45. ^ "Working 'The Chain,' Abattoir Workers Face Lifelong Injuries". Npr.org. Archived from the original on 30 January 2019. Retrieved thirty January 2019.
46. ^ Baran, B. E.; Rogelberg, S. Yard.; Clausen, T (2016). "Routinized killing of animals: Going across muddy work and prestige to sympathise the well-being of butchery workers". Organisation. 23 (iii): 351–369. doi:10.1177/1350508416629456. S2CID 148368906.
47. ^ Dorovskikh, Anna (2015). Killing for a Living: Psychological and Physiological Furnishings of Alienation of Food Production on Slaughterhouse Workers (BSc). University of Colorado, Boulder. Archived from the original on 6 Jan 2018. Retrieved 27 May 2019.
48. ^ Fitzgerald, A. J.; Kalof, L. (2009). "Slaughterhouses and Increased Crime Rates: An Empirical Assay of the Spillover From "The Jungle" Into the Surrounding Customs". Organization & Environment. 22 (2): 158–184. doi:10.1177/1350508416629456. S2CID 148368906. Archived from the original on 25 May 2019. Retrieved 27 May 2019.
49. ^ "The Psychological Damage of Slaughterhouse Work". PTSDJournal. Archived from the original on 25 May 2019. Retrieved 23 May 2019.
50. ^ Berg, Jennifer; Jackson, Chris (12 May 2021). "Nearly nine in x Americans eat meat every bit office of their diet". Ipsos. Archived from the original on 20 July 2021. Retrieved 13 February 2022.
51. ^ Ettinger, Jill (21 November 2017). "70% of Americans Want Meliorate Treatment for Subcontract Animals, Poll Finds". Organic Authorisation.
52. ^ Piper, Kelsey (5 Nov 2018). "California and Florida voters could alter the lives of millions of animals on Election Twenty-four hours". Vox.
53. ^ Reese Anthis, Jacy (twenty November 2017). "Animals, Food, and Technology (AFT) Survey 2017". Sentience Constitute. Surveys. Archived from the original on four January 2022. Retrieved 13 February 2022.
54. ^ Siegner, Cathy (25 January 2018). "Survey: Nearly consumers like meat, slaughterhouses not so much". Food Dive. Archived from the original on 2 Nov 2021. Retrieved thirteen February 2022.
55. ^ Norwood, Bailey; Murray, Susan. "FooDS Food Deman Survey, Volume 5, Effect ix: Jan 18, 2018" (PDF). Oklahoma State University. Archived from the original (PDF) on six August 2019. Retrieved thirteen Feb 2022.
56. ^ Stockwell, Ryan J. Growing a new agrarian myth: the american agriculture motility, identity, and the call to save the family farm (Thesis). p. 19.
57. ^ Browning, Heather; Veit, Walter (5 May 2020). "Is humane slaughter possible?". Animals. x (v): 799. doi:10.3390/ani10050799. PMC7278393. PMID 32380765.
58. ^ Anil, M. Haluk (July 2012). "Religious slaughter: A current controversial animal welfare issue". Animal Frontiers. 2 (3): 64–67. doi:x.2527/af.2012-0051.

External links [edit]

• Canada Agricultural Products Human activity R.S., 1985, c. 20 (quaternary Supp.)
• Humane Slaughter of Livestock Regulations
• Slovak Squealer Slaughter and Traditional Sausage Making – article in English with detailed pictures of a Slovak family slaughtering a hog in the traditional mode
• Alive Counter Near Slaughtered Animals Worldwide

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal_slaughter

Posted by: blunthaideatel.blogspot.com

Share this post